CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Human development history has shown that sustainable development and self-sustaining progress of any country has generally followed the development and applications of science and technology (S&T), controlled by and responsive to the needs and endowment of a country (Adeniyi, 1999).
Many developed countries of the world today achieved their level of development through the adaptation of technology and development of an efficient S&T capacity. There is no doubt that the importance of S&T to national development has been recognized by nations who currently are in the forefront of human development index.
Consequently, human and national sustainable development are determined largely by the level of indigenous and endogenous scientific and technological research, the communication of research results and on the knowledge acquired and brought to bear on policy making, programme formulation, project implementation, monitoring and impact assessment.
Furthermore, any society without indigenous and endogenous S&T research capacity and capability and high level of literacy cannot but continue to remain underdeveloped (Adeniyi, 1999,). Scientific research in all its forms is the cornerstone of a nation’s social and economic development (Abiodun, 1999). Though geographical and human size of a nation may be indicators of its potential power, the real power of a country is measured today in terms of its economic progress, that is, the proven capacity to translate scientific knowledge through its judicious and determined exploitation of technologies in economic productivity. It has been observed that the Nigerian society lacks an in-depth understanding of the role of S&T in national development plans (Abiodun, 1999,). The need to integrate S&T into national planning has been overemphasized.
In reviewing efforts at bringing science and technology to bear on national development, it is important to examine underdevelopment of S&T in less developed countries and relate it to current national underdevelopment. It has been established that science has a function in relation to the development of production. This function is partly driven by economic forces.
Karl Marx, a classical economist once observed the importance of economic organization in the development of link between science and production.
He argued that the requirements of the economy will eventually have an effect on the direction of scientific development itself. Furthermore, that technological advance generates new specialized skills at the interface between science and production, notably the various types of engineering skills.
The new specialists were able to interpret the needs of the entrepreneur to the scientists and economic demand began to affect the orientation of science. The prime mover here is the search for profit. There is no doubt, that economic demands for innovation had tremendous influence in the evolution of science and indeed R&D. The phases in the development of relations between science and production had been identified as follows (Bernal, 1970):
• Early part of the industrial revolution when production technologies were often the source of new scientific discoveries.
• Second phase which started with the development of the electrical and organic chemical industries informed the new relationship between science and production. During this phase, research laboratory became the source of technological innovations and entrepreneurs drew science into closer relationships with production as they began to invest directly in scientific research as a potential source of profit.
The issues raised here attempts to support the belief that science has a social function in relation to the development of production.
Furthermore, the demands of the production system can influence the way in which scientific institutions develop and the content of science.
Industrialized market economies developed based on the relationship between science and production. The form in which scientific institutions developed and linked to production in advanced countries was further strengthened through linkage of network of engineering institutions and machinery manufacturers and the types of research carried out.
Some schools of thought are of the opinion that scientific institutions such as research institutes, scientific societies, science policy organizations do not have the same social role everywhere. They argued that scientific institutions in less developed countries might as well serve different social purposes from those in advanced countries. They concluded that by building new research institutes, there are indications that they will function in the same way as the existing ones and may have very little to do with the development of production (Cooper, 1978).
An alternative view to the current state of development of scientific institutions in less developed countries was linked to “technological dependence”. The dynamics of the underdeveloped economy was observed to create a situation where local scientific institutions were alienated from production.
For instance, the import substitution industrialization strategy adopted by most less developed countries encouraged technological dependence. In most countries foreign technology was substituted for technologies that might have been developed by local scientific research and development institutions. The most important element in this view is not that there are import-substitution policy, but simply that the technologies needed generally exist already in the industrialized countries and are often proprietary (ie owned by private enterprises).
This technological dependence adversely affected the thinking and orientation of the potential beneficiaries of local scientific endeavours. For instance, there were cases where local research institutions have successfully developed the types of technology required by local enterprises, but they were rejected in preference to the foreign version on grounds that it is less likely to work.
The consequence of this is that scientific institutions over the years became alienated from production activities. In fact, they became “marginalized” as there were no demands for locally developed technologies from the production sector. Invariably, science became largely for consumption rather than an investment as in the industrialized countries. Also, lack of pressures on science from the local economy, implies that the main determinants of research orientation are the individual decision of research workers. In Nigeria, the situation was not different from other less developed countries.
The incapacity of Nigeria to use scientific and technological research as dynamic elements for social development is a consequence of the characteristics of the prevailing national projects. Unless the approach to implementation of national projects takes into consideration the aspirations of the majority of Nigerian populace, scientific resource will continue to be cultural luxury.
Since after the independence there has been considerable national activity to increase scientific and technological capacity of the country. This is reflected in the number of institutional frameworks for S &T development in the country.
Early efforts to promote the development of S & T national capacity after independence centred on direct aid from developed countries. This type of aid include donations and loans for scientific equipment, subsidies for research project, missions of qualified personnel to train nationals or to help formulate S&T policy and scholarships for further study abroad. Though the foundation was laid through foreign assistance, however, very limited efforts were made to build on this foundation and also to strengthen the existing institutional frameworks.
Consequently, scientific and technological systems in the country were very limited and totally unconnected with national problems. In contrast to situation in developed countries, science planning endeavoured to control and direct existing efficient scientific and technological research system. After more than four decades of efforts at S& T development, what are the results? A cursory analysis indicates that in general terms, there has been very limited progress made in absolute terms. One remarkable observation is the quantitative deficiencies of Nigerian R & D system.
In developed countries for instance, most R&D is on subjects that were connected directly or indirectly with national goals such as defence, social development or prestige. Scientific development was reflected in the development of industrial and agricultural technology and in the growth of production. In Nigeria, considerable numbers of scientific researches were not designed to address the basic societal problems.
This lack of connection between the goals of scientific research and the needs of society is a characteristic of underdevelopment (Herrera, 1978). The irrelevance of much scientific works in developing countries is widely acknowledged and hardly requires proof.
Evidence abound that agricultural production in Nigeria increased after the second world war, of which two-thirds of the increase was as a result of more land cultivated and not due to increased productivity or yield. (Adeniyi,1999). In contrast to Europe, despite the limited land availability, production increased remarkably due to increase in yield and productivity within the same period. In the industrial sector, the situation is not different either. Industrial technological research is practically non-existent.
The private sector contributes insignificantly to the total R&D investments in underdeveloped countries. In developed countries between 60 and 70% of R&D is undertaken by the private sector while in Nigeria, the private sector undertakes 0 to 0.1% of R&D (Ogbu 2003). An overview of the R&D activities in Nigeria over the years has shown the lack of social relevance. Initial efforts concentrated more on basic research than applied research.
In advanced countries far more were invested in applied and development research than in basic research. However, in Nigeria much more were spent on basic research than in applied research and development. Despite this, basic research has not contributed significantly in addressing societal needs or evoked considerable concern for greater investments in applied research. Consequently, applied research is very weak and there is practically no interaction between the different types of research and production.
The few basic research centres (especially, the Universities) function as isolated enclaves which do little to encourage local R&D. Even, the current state of the universities has further compounded the R&D problems as infrastructures have decayed as well as high turnover rate of seasoned researchers and scientists. These distortions in the S&T systems in most developing countries informed the progressive withdrawal of international funding agencies from national S&T development strategies. For instance, evidence abound that international agencies responsible for programmes of international cooperation are no longer keen in funding S&T development.
Presently, there are more tendencies among international donors to give funds for projects with “direct social interest” like housing investment and health (Coopers, 1978). This underscores why presently, there is limited attention to setting up programmes that would create the scientific and technological capacity to solve basic problems as the visible manifestations of such efforts are only a symptom. The question that should be asked is “why is the situation like this, and what can be done to redress it?
One tends to believe that the complete failure of these efforts is associated with the erroneous suppositions about the problem of incorporating science and technology in the production system. The obstacles to this process are direct consequence of the structure of underdevelopment resulting from insertion of underdeveloped countries into the international system. The bottom line of the whole scenario lies in the prevailing nature of economic and social structure.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE RESEARCH PROBLEM
The importance of science and technology to national development cannot be overemphasized. However, the approach and strategies for achieving an S&T-driven economic development deserves consideration and appraisal. A wide variety of different policies have been pursued in Nigeria in an effort to foster technological development with the aim of accelerating the pace of economic development.
Furthermore, these sectoral development policies were formulated to guide the process of development in relevant areas of the economy. These policies include among others, the following:
• Science and technology policy, which aims to provide innovative initiatives for development in all aspects of social well-being such as agriculture, industry, health, etc.
• Industrial policy, which aims to increase productivity through the application of modern technologies and machineries.
• Agricultural policy, which aims to increase food production in order to ensure food security with minimum degradation to the environment.
• Other policies include health policy, environmental policy, economic and trade policy, and social policy.
The key questions to these policies are as follows:
• Has the S&T policy been a critical determinant of national development performance?
• Has the application of S&T contributed to the development of
industries in Nigeria as well as increase the industrial
productivity?
• How has S&T impacted on agricultural production leading to increase in food production and ensuring food security and poverty reduction?
• What relationship exists between S&T policy institutions and the
socio-economic frameworks established for national
development?
This study intends to address these questions as well as identify factors responsible for inability of Nigeria to fully realize its national objectives of S&T-driven rapid industrialization geared towards
increasing national productive output and developing a dynamic and self-reliant economy. Also, efforts shall be made to unravel why the following ineffective mechanisms hindered the national S&T objectives:
• dearth of people-oriented, market-driven, job-creating dynamic S&T policies to guide national development efforts;
• minimum investment in the training of skilled human resources to sustain scientific creativity and technological innovation and failure to create an enabling environment for active S&T research and development;
• low investments in S&T infrastructure;
• inefficiently managed S&T institutions with duplicating mandates;
• poor intra-government cooperation and collaboration among key S&T stakeholders;
• lack of an integrated approach to national development efforts by policy makers, administrators, academicians/ researchers, development bankers, financiers, industrialists and entrepreneurs; and
• faulty mechanisms for creating an interface between S&T, industry and government.
The above issues underline the rationale for this study and it is expected that the outcome will provide strategies for establishment of frameworks for short-term, medium-term and long-term plan of action for operation of the current S&T policy. Also, practical programmes and projects will be identified for consideration by the Nigerian government in order to give focus and relevance to the S&T policy in addressing societal needs.
1.3 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
The immediate objectives of the study are:
• To review the current National S&T Policy and present a critique on it based on the point of view of explicit and implicit S&T policy, and its relevance to the society.
• To identify the existence or not, of a National R&D policy which should give the necessary goals, guide lines and directions for R&D on national projects.
• To analyze the research planning process and implementation with a view to identifying the strength, weaknesses, opportunities and constraints to the total utilization of S&T policy for national development.
• To examine the existing institutional frameworks for research and relate their mandates in terms of social function of S&T.
• To identify achievements of the Research Institutions (RIs) and constraints hindering their greater contribution to socio-economic growth and development of the country.
• To examine the approach to R&D as it is currently being practiced and relate it to industrialization in the context of market-driven R&D and commercialization of viable research results.
The development or futuristic objectives are as follows:
• To lay a lasting foundation for future works on S&T policy formulation, planning and implementation as well as promoting and evaluation in Nigeria.
• Provide the required background knowledge for awareness creation on the relationship between science, technology and society.
• Provide platform for promotion and dissemination of S&T information that are designed to assist in commercializing viable research results in order to add value to the Nations’ natural resources with a view to reducing heavy dependence on importation of raw materials and capital goods with attendant foreign exchange implications.
1.4 JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY
The essence of this study is encapsulated in the review of the past and current efforts made in Nigeria to achieve national development through the application of science and technology (S&T). Opinion makers believed that science and technology have not contributed to the growth and development of the country despite decades of its recognition as contributory sources of economic development.
These opinions often shape the society’s’ appreciation and understanding of the role science and technology could play in achieving sustainable development. It had far-reaching implications and influences on national development both in the area of education, agriculture, health, environment and industrial development.
Although studies have been conducted in the country on the role of research in national development as well as management of R&D and the various constraints limiting commercialization of R&D, not much has been done in the area of science and technology policy and societal development. Moreover, the first national policy on S&T was enunciated about 18 years ago and the current policy was formulated a year ago. Considering the time frame between the first policy and the current policy and relating the implementation of the first policy to the socio-economic development of Nigeria within this period, there are some challenges in terms of determining the level of impact made by S&T policy.
This study therefore, attempts to relate the two science and technology policy frameworks to societal development from the point of view of the nature of the policies, its awareness and appreciation by the society, its application in guiding societal development as well as the overall level of S&T literacy. It is expected that the study will reveal the various limitations to the evolution of S&T in Nigeria and make valid suggestions on what could be done to improve on the current approach so as to make S&T truly international and competitive in the country.
The findings of the study will be of immense benefits to all stakeholders in the science and technology sector and more importantly, to the government. Since government is the major stakeholder and financier of S&T programmes and activities, the study will provide a framework for government to begin its reform process in the field of S&T by making it more market-driven and private sector- led.
Also, it will provide a guide towards formulating measures to promote S&T in the country. The findings shall provide the background information to assess the effectiveness of S&T structure and the overall performance of its institutional frameworks. Part of the overall expectation from this study is the development of national indicators for the assessment of the impact of S&T on National development.
The study shall emphasize on the need for development of S&T infrastructure and total utilization of S&T capacity in pursuance of national projects aimed at socio-economic development. Also, the organized private sector will find the outcome of the study quite useful in shaping opinion on the need for government to foster effective and unbroken linkage sector in order to ensure that the private sector benefit from indigenous research efforts and promote technology acquisition and transfer from developed and developing countries.
It was therefore, anticipated, that the ideas emerging from the study could be used by voluntary and non-governmental agencies when implementing policies relating to science and technology. It could also be used by educational (universities), training and R&D institutions as bases for planning new programmes and research strategies and evolving appropriate support systems for application of S&T to national development.
Finally, it is hoped that the research findings from this study will generate diverse interests in the field of S&T policy formulation and implementation, especially policy study in Nigeria and Africa in general.
1.5 STATEMENT OF HYPOTHESIS
In order to validate the findings from the study a quantitative analysis
was carried out through the use of statistical instrument. To this end,
the following hypotheses were formulated for testing.
HYPOTHESIS 1
Null (Ho): The Nigerian society is not aware of and do not
contribute to the formulation of S&T policy.
Alternative (H1): The Nigerian society is aware of and do contribute to the formulation of S&T policy.
HYPOTHESIS 2
Null (Ho): Science and technology policy has not been a critical
determinant of development performance in Nigeria.
Alternative (HI): Science and technology has been a critical
determinant of development performance in Nigeria
HYPOTHESIS 3
Null (Ho): Science and technology policy has not played a
critical role in national development of Nigeria.
Science and technology policy has played a critical role in national development of Nigeria.
HYPOTHESIS 4
Null (Ho): Lack of demand for innovations in industry and
agriculture is not responsible for enability of S&T to impact on national development.
Lack of demand for innovations in industry and agriculture is responsible for enability of S&T to impact on national development.
2
The above hypotheses were tested using chi-square (X2) statistical analysis.
1.6 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
The study looked at the past (1986) and current (2003) National policy on Science and Technology and reviewed the documents along the line of their explicit and implicit functions. The assessment of the impact of R&D on national development was limited to applied research carried out by Research Institutes in Nigeria. The study will examined among other issues, the following:
• Review of the National S&T Policy
• Critique on the National S &T Policy
• Science and Technology Literacy
• Research Policy and Development
• Research Planning, Analysis and Implementation.
• Institutional Frameworks for Research (Research Institutions)
• Achievements and Constraints
• Infrastructure and Management of R&D
• Innovation and Technology Acquisition.
• Capacity Building
• Funding of S & T development and Research
• Market-driven R&D and the Role of Private sector
• Communication with Scientists and the Public
REFERENCES
Abiodun, A. A. (1999) Research: The Foremost Prerequisite for Sustainable Development in Nigeria”. In: Adeniyi, P.O. (ed), Research Capacity Building for Sustainable Development in Nigeria. Unilag Consult, Lagos, Nigeria, Pg.13-27.
Adeniyi, P.O. (1999) “Research and Sustainable Development”. In: Adeniyi, P.O (ed). Research Capacity Building for Sustainable Development, Unilag Consult, Lagos, Nigeria, pg 3-10
Bernal, J. D. (1970). Science in History, London, Penguin pg. 24-25.
Cooper, C. (1978). (ed). Science, Technology and Development: The Political Economy of Technical Advance in Underdeveloped Countries Frank Cass & Co. Ltd. pg. 3-4.
Herrera, A. (1978). “Social Determinants of Science Policy in Latin America”. In: Cooper, C (ed), Science, Technology and Development, Frank Cass and Company Ltd., London) pg.10-38.
Ogbu O. 2003, “Science and Technology Policy for Nigeria’s Reconstruction”. A Dialogue with Policy Makers and Legislators. A Paper Presented at the S&T Policy Seminar and Training, September 29, Abuja Nigeria. Pg.1-9.
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Human development history has shown that sustainable development and self-sustaining progress of any country has generally followed the development and applications of science and technology (S&T), controlled by and responsive to the needs and endowment of a country (Adeniyi, 1999).
Many developed countries of the world today achieved their level of development through the adaptation of technology and development of an efficient S&T capacity. There is no doubt that the importance of S&T to national development has been recognized by nations who currently are in the forefront of human development index.
Consequently, human and national sustainable development are determined largely by the level of indigenous and endogenous scientific and technological research, the communication of research results and on the knowledge acquired and brought to bear on policy making, programme formulation, project implementation, monitoring and impact assessment.
Furthermore, any society without indigenous and endogenous S&T research capacity and capability and high level of literacy cannot but continue to remain underdeveloped (Adeniyi, 1999,). Scientific research in all its forms is the cornerstone of a nation’s social and economic development (Abiodun, 1999). Though geographical and human size of a nation may be indicators of its potential power, the real power of a country is measured today in terms of its economic progress, that is, the proven capacity to translate scientific knowledge through its judicious and determined exploitation of technologies in economic productivity. It has been observed that the Nigerian society lacks an in-depth understanding of the role of S&T in national development plans (Abiodun, 1999,). The need to integrate S&T into national planning has been overemphasized.
In reviewing efforts at bringing science and technology to bear on national development, it is important to examine underdevelopment of S&T in less developed countries and relate it to current national underdevelopment. It has been established that science has a function in relation to the development of production. This function is partly driven by economic forces.
Karl Marx, a classical economist once observed the importance of economic organization in the development of link between science and production.
He argued that the requirements of the economy will eventually have an effect on the direction of scientific development itself. Furthermore, that technological advance generates new specialized skills at the interface between science and production, notably the various types of engineering skills.
The new specialists were able to interpret the needs of the entrepreneur to the scientists and economic demand began to affect the orientation of science. The prime mover here is the search for profit. There is no doubt, that economic demands for innovation had tremendous influence in the evolution of science and indeed R&D. The phases in the development of relations between science and production had been identified as follows (Bernal, 1970):
• Early part of the industrial revolution when production technologies were often the source of new scientific discoveries.
• Second phase which started with the development of the electrical and organic chemical industries informed the new relationship between science and production. During this phase, research laboratory became the source of technological innovations and entrepreneurs drew science into closer relationships with production as they began to invest directly in scientific research as a potential source of profit.
The issues raised here attempts to support the belief that science has a social function in relation to the development of production.
Furthermore, the demands of the production system can influence the way in which scientific institutions develop and the content of science.
Industrialized market economies developed based on the relationship between science and production. The form in which scientific institutions developed and linked to production in advanced countries was further strengthened through linkage of network of engineering institutions and machinery manufacturers and the types of research carried out.
Some schools of thought are of the opinion that scientific institutions such as research institutes, scientific societies, science policy organizations do not have the same social role everywhere. They argued that scientific institutions in less developed countries might as well serve different social purposes from those in advanced countries. They concluded that by building new research institutes, there are indications that they will function in the same way as the existing ones and may have very little to do with the development of production (Cooper, 1978).
An alternative view to the current state of development of scientific institutions in less developed countries was linked to “technological dependence”. The dynamics of the underdeveloped economy was observed to create a situation where local scientific institutions were alienated from production.
For instance, the import substitution industrialization strategy adopted by most less developed countries encouraged technological dependence. In most countries foreign technology was substituted for technologies that might have been developed by local scientific research and development institutions. The most important element in this view is not that there are import-substitution policy, but simply that the technologies needed generally exist already in the industrialized countries and are often proprietary (ie owned by private enterprises).
This technological dependence adversely affected the thinking and orientation of the potential beneficiaries of local scientific endeavours. For instance, there were cases where local research institutions have successfully developed the types of technology required by local enterprises, but they were rejected in preference to the foreign version on grounds that it is less likely to work.
The consequence of this is that scientific institutions over the years became alienated from production activities. In fact, they became “marginalized” as there were no demands for locally developed technologies from the production sector. Invariably, science became largely for consumption rather than an investment as in the industrialized countries. Also, lack of pressures on science from the local economy, implies that the main determinants of research orientation are the individual decision of research workers. In Nigeria, the situation was not different from other less developed countries.
The incapacity of Nigeria to use scientific and technological research as dynamic elements for social development is a consequence of the characteristics of the prevailing national projects. Unless the approach to implementation of national projects takes into consideration the aspirations of the majority of Nigerian populace, scientific resource will continue to be cultural luxury.
Since after the independence there has been considerable national activity to increase scientific and technological capacity of the country. This is reflected in the number of institutional frameworks for S &T development in the country.
Early efforts to promote the development of S & T national capacity after independence centred on direct aid from developed countries. This type of aid include donations and loans for scientific equipment, subsidies for research project, missions of qualified personnel to train nationals or to help formulate S&T policy and scholarships for further study abroad. Though the foundation was laid through foreign assistance, however, very limited efforts were made to build on this foundation and also to strengthen the existing institutional frameworks.
Consequently, scientific and technological systems in the country were very limited and totally unconnected with national problems. In contrast to situation in developed countries, science planning endeavoured to control and direct existing efficient scientific and technological research system. After more than four decades of efforts at S& T development, what are the results? A cursory analysis indicates that in general terms, there has been very limited progress made in absolute terms. One remarkable observation is the quantitative deficiencies of Nigerian R & D system.
In developed countries for instance, most R&D is on subjects that were connected directly or indirectly with national goals such as defence, social development or prestige. Scientific development was reflected in the development of industrial and agricultural technology and in the growth of production. In Nigeria, considerable numbers of scientific researches were not designed to address the basic societal problems.
This lack of connection between the goals of scientific research and the needs of society is a characteristic of underdevelopment (Herrera, 1978). The irrelevance of much scientific works in developing countries is widely acknowledged and hardly requires proof.
Evidence abound that agricultural production in Nigeria increased after the second world war, of which two-thirds of the increase was as a result of more land cultivated and not due to increased productivity or yield. (Adeniyi,1999). In contrast to Europe, despite the limited land availability, production increased remarkably due to increase in yield and productivity within the same period. In the industrial sector, the situation is not different either. Industrial technological research is practically non-existent.
The private sector contributes insignificantly to the total R&D investments in underdeveloped countries. In developed countries between 60 and 70% of R&D is undertaken by the private sector while in Nigeria, the private sector undertakes 0 to 0.1% of R&D (Ogbu 2003). An overview of the R&D activities in Nigeria over the years has shown the lack of social relevance. Initial efforts concentrated more on basic research than applied research.
In advanced countries far more were invested in applied and development research than in basic research. However, in Nigeria much more were spent on basic research than in applied research and development. Despite this, basic research has not contributed significantly in addressing societal needs or evoked considerable concern for greater investments in applied research. Consequently, applied research is very weak and there is practically no interaction between the different types of research and production.
The few basic research centres (especially, the Universities) function as isolated enclaves which do little to encourage local R&D. Even, the current state of the universities has further compounded the R&D problems as infrastructures have decayed as well as high turnover rate of seasoned researchers and scientists. These distortions in the S&T systems in most developing countries informed the progressive withdrawal of international funding agencies from national S&T development strategies. For instance, evidence abound that international agencies responsible for programmes of international cooperation are no longer keen in funding S&T development.
Presently, there are more tendencies among international donors to give funds for projects with “direct social interest” like housing investment and health (Coopers, 1978). This underscores why presently, there is limited attention to setting up programmes that would create the scientific and technological capacity to solve basic problems as the visible manifestations of such efforts are only a symptom. The question that should be asked is “why is the situation like this, and what can be done to redress it?
One tends to believe that the complete failure of these efforts is associated with the erroneous suppositions about the problem of incorporating science and technology in the production system. The obstacles to this process are direct consequence of the structure of underdevelopment resulting from insertion of underdeveloped countries into the international system. The bottom line of the whole scenario lies in the prevailing nature of economic and social structure.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE RESEARCH PROBLEM
The importance of science and technology to national development cannot be overemphasized. However, the approach and strategies for achieving an S&T-driven economic development deserves consideration and appraisal. A wide variety of different policies have been pursued in Nigeria in an effort to foster technological development with the aim of accelerating the pace of economic development.
Furthermore, these sectoral development policies were formulated to guide the process of development in relevant areas of the economy. These policies include among others, the following:
• Science and technology policy, which aims to provide innovative initiatives for development in all aspects of social well-being such as agriculture, industry, health, etc.
• Industrial policy, which aims to increase productivity through the application of modern technologies and machineries.
• Agricultural policy, which aims to increase food production in order to ensure food security with minimum degradation to the environment.
• Other policies include health policy, environmental policy, economic and trade policy, and social policy.
The key questions to these policies are as follows:
• Has the S&T policy been a critical determinant of national development performance?
• Has the application of S&T contributed to the development of
industries in Nigeria as well as increase the industrial
productivity?
• How has S&T impacted on agricultural production leading to increase in food production and ensuring food security and poverty reduction?
• What relationship exists between S&T policy institutions and the
socio-economic frameworks established for national
development?
This study intends to address these questions as well as identify factors responsible for inability of Nigeria to fully realize its national objectives of S&T-driven rapid industrialization geared towards
increasing national productive output and developing a dynamic and self-reliant economy. Also, efforts shall be made to unravel why the following ineffective mechanisms hindered the national S&T objectives:
• dearth of people-oriented, market-driven, job-creating dynamic S&T policies to guide national development efforts;
• minimum investment in the training of skilled human resources to sustain scientific creativity and technological innovation and failure to create an enabling environment for active S&T research and development;
• low investments in S&T infrastructure;
• inefficiently managed S&T institutions with duplicating mandates;
• poor intra-government cooperation and collaboration among key S&T stakeholders;
• lack of an integrated approach to national development efforts by policy makers, administrators, academicians/ researchers, development bankers, financiers, industrialists and entrepreneurs; and
• faulty mechanisms for creating an interface between S&T, industry and government.
The above issues underline the rationale for this study and it is expected that the outcome will provide strategies for establishment of frameworks for short-term, medium-term and long-term plan of action for operation of the current S&T policy. Also, practical programmes and projects will be identified for consideration by the Nigerian government in order to give focus and relevance to the S&T policy in addressing societal needs.
1.3 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
The immediate objectives of the study are:
• To review the current National S&T Policy and present a critique on it based on the point of view of explicit and implicit S&T policy, and its relevance to the society.
• To identify the existence or not, of a National R&D policy which should give the necessary goals, guide lines and directions for R&D on national projects.
• To analyze the research planning process and implementation with a view to identifying the strength, weaknesses, opportunities and constraints to the total utilization of S&T policy for national development.
• To examine the existing institutional frameworks for research and relate their mandates in terms of social function of S&T.
• To identify achievements of the Research Institutions (RIs) and constraints hindering their greater contribution to socio-economic growth and development of the country.
• To examine the approach to R&D as it is currently being practiced and relate it to industrialization in the context of market-driven R&D and commercialization of viable research results.
The development or futuristic objectives are as follows:
• To lay a lasting foundation for future works on S&T policy formulation, planning and implementation as well as promoting and evaluation in Nigeria.
• Provide the required background knowledge for awareness creation on the relationship between science, technology and society.
• Provide platform for promotion and dissemination of S&T information that are designed to assist in commercializing viable research results in order to add value to the Nations’ natural resources with a view to reducing heavy dependence on importation of raw materials and capital goods with attendant foreign exchange implications.
1.4 JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY
The essence of this study is encapsulated in the review of the past and current efforts made in Nigeria to achieve national development through the application of science and technology (S&T). Opinion makers believed that science and technology have not contributed to the growth and development of the country despite decades of its recognition as contributory sources of economic development.
These opinions often shape the society’s’ appreciation and understanding of the role science and technology could play in achieving sustainable development. It had far-reaching implications and influences on national development both in the area of education, agriculture, health, environment and industrial development.
Although studies have been conducted in the country on the role of research in national development as well as management of R&D and the various constraints limiting commercialization of R&D, not much has been done in the area of science and technology policy and societal development. Moreover, the first national policy on S&T was enunciated about 18 years ago and the current policy was formulated a year ago. Considering the time frame between the first policy and the current policy and relating the implementation of the first policy to the socio-economic development of Nigeria within this period, there are some challenges in terms of determining the level of impact made by S&T policy.
This study therefore, attempts to relate the two science and technology policy frameworks to societal development from the point of view of the nature of the policies, its awareness and appreciation by the society, its application in guiding societal development as well as the overall level of S&T literacy. It is expected that the study will reveal the various limitations to the evolution of S&T in Nigeria and make valid suggestions on what could be done to improve on the current approach so as to make S&T truly international and competitive in the country.
The findings of the study will be of immense benefits to all stakeholders in the science and technology sector and more importantly, to the government. Since government is the major stakeholder and financier of S&T programmes and activities, the study will provide a framework for government to begin its reform process in the field of S&T by making it more market-driven and private sector- led.
Also, it will provide a guide towards formulating measures to promote S&T in the country. The findings shall provide the background information to assess the effectiveness of S&T structure and the overall performance of its institutional frameworks. Part of the overall expectation from this study is the development of national indicators for the assessment of the impact of S&T on National development.
The study shall emphasize on the need for development of S&T infrastructure and total utilization of S&T capacity in pursuance of national projects aimed at socio-economic development. Also, the organized private sector will find the outcome of the study quite useful in shaping opinion on the need for government to foster effective and unbroken linkage sector in order to ensure that the private sector benefit from indigenous research efforts and promote technology acquisition and transfer from developed and developing countries.
It was therefore, anticipated, that the ideas emerging from the study could be used by voluntary and non-governmental agencies when implementing policies relating to science and technology. It could also be used by educational (universities), training and R&D institutions as bases for planning new programmes and research strategies and evolving appropriate support systems for application of S&T to national development.
Finally, it is hoped that the research findings from this study will generate diverse interests in the field of S&T policy formulation and implementation, especially policy study in Nigeria and Africa in general.
1.5 STATEMENT OF HYPOTHESIS
In order to validate the findings from the study a quantitative analysis
was carried out through the use of statistical instrument. To this end,
the following hypotheses were formulated for testing.
HYPOTHESIS 1
Null (Ho): The Nigerian society is not aware of and do not
contribute to the formulation of S&T policy.
Alternative (H1): The Nigerian society is aware of and do contribute to the formulation of S&T policy.
HYPOTHESIS 2
Null (Ho): Science and technology policy has not been a critical
determinant of development performance in Nigeria.
Alternative (HI): Science and technology has been a critical
determinant of development performance in Nigeria
HYPOTHESIS 3
Null (Ho): Science and technology policy has not played a
critical role in national development of Nigeria.
Science and technology policy has played a critical role in national development of Nigeria.
HYPOTHESIS 4
Null (Ho): Lack of demand for innovations in industry and
agriculture is not responsible for enability of S&T to impact on national development.
Lack of demand for innovations in industry and agriculture is responsible for enability of S&T to impact on national development.
2
The above hypotheses were tested using chi-square (X2) statistical analysis.
1.6 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
The study looked at the past (1986) and current (2003) National policy on Science and Technology and reviewed the documents along the line of their explicit and implicit functions. The assessment of the impact of R&D on national development was limited to applied research carried out by Research Institutes in Nigeria. The study will examined among other issues, the following:
• Review of the National S&T Policy
• Critique on the National S &T Policy
• Science and Technology Literacy
• Research Policy and Development
• Research Planning, Analysis and Implementation.
• Institutional Frameworks for Research (Research Institutions)
• Achievements and Constraints
• Infrastructure and Management of R&D
• Innovation and Technology Acquisition.
• Capacity Building
• Funding of S & T development and Research
• Market-driven R&D and the Role of Private sector
• Communication with Scientists and the Public
REFERENCES
Abiodun, A. A. (1999) Research: The Foremost Prerequisite for Sustainable Development in Nigeria”. In: Adeniyi, P.O. (ed), Research Capacity Building for Sustainable Development in Nigeria. Unilag Consult, Lagos, Nigeria, Pg.13-27.
Adeniyi, P.O. (1999) “Research and Sustainable Development”. In: Adeniyi, P.O (ed). Research Capacity Building for Sustainable Development, Unilag Consult, Lagos, Nigeria, pg 3-10
Bernal, J. D. (1970). Science in History, London, Penguin pg. 24-25.
Cooper, C. (1978). (ed). Science, Technology and Development: The Political Economy of Technical Advance in Underdeveloped Countries Frank Cass & Co. Ltd. pg. 3-4.
Herrera, A. (1978). “Social Determinants of Science Policy in Latin America”. In: Cooper, C (ed), Science, Technology and Development, Frank Cass and Company Ltd., London) pg.10-38.
Ogbu O. 2003, “Science and Technology Policy for Nigeria’s Reconstruction”. A Dialogue with Policy Makers and Legislators. A Paper Presented at the S&T Policy Seminar and Training, September 29, Abuja Nigeria. Pg.1-9.
PLEASE,
print the following instructions and information if you will like to order/buy
our complete written material(s).
HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL(S)
After paying the appropriate amount (#3000) into our bank Account
below, send the following information to our Whatsapp 08061135915 OR bavicola13@gmail.com, edupedia17@gmail.com :
(1) Your project
topics
(2) Email
Address
(3) Payment
Name
(4) Teller Number
We will send the DOWNLOAD LINK for your material(s) immediately we
receive bank alert
BANK ACCOUNTS
Account
Name: Bakare Victor Oladapo
Access Bank 0759882072
First Bank 3077844205
Skye Bank 3023641985
GT Bank 0262146570
Access Bank 0759882072
First Bank 3077844205
Skye Bank 3023641985
GT Bank 0262146570
HOW TO IDENTIFY SCAM/FRAUD
As
a result of fraud in Nigeria, people don’t believe there are good online
businesses in Nigeria.
But
on this site, we have provided “chapter one” of all our project topics and
materials in order to convince you that we have the complete materials.
Secondly,
we have provided our Bank Account on this site. Our Bank Account contains
all information about the owner of this website. For your own security,
all payment should be made in the bank.
No
Fraudulent company uses Bank Account as a means of payment, because Bank
Account contains the overall information of the owner.
CAUTION/WARNING
Please, DO NOT COPY any of our materials on this website
WORD-TO-WORD. These materials are to assist, direct you during your
project. Study the materials carefully and use the information in
them to develop your own new copy. Copying these materials word-to-word is
CHEATING/ ILLEGAL because it affects Educational standard, and we will not be
held responsible for it. If you must copy word-to-word please do not order/buy.
That you ordered this material shows you have agreed not to copy
word-to-word.
Comments
Post a Comment