Skip to main content

Difference between the Constitution in 1963 and 1979 in Nigeria

A constitution is the set of fundamental laws, established to govern a country. However, this set of laws often transform. What is the main difference between 1963 and 1979 constitution in Nigeria? What urgent needs have caused the changes in the act of 1963? How many revisions did the constitution of Nigeria overcome? Read on to find out!

Difference Between 1963 and 1979 Constitution in Nigeria

Constitution in Nigeria is the primary legislative power, which is built of regulative norms. They define the rights and responsibility of the people and the leaders.

Nigeria is a country, where you can observe a series of constitutions:

  • 1963 constitution (First Republic)
  • 1979 constitution (Second Republic)
  • 1993 constitution (Third Republic)
  • 1999 constitution (Fourth Republic)

What was the primary difference between 1963 and 1979 constitution?

Major differences between 1963 and 1979 constitution

Constitutional development in Nigeria can be generally divided into two epochs:

  • the pre-independence or colonial period, which covered 6 constitutional instruments of 1914, 1922, 1946, 1951, 1954, and 1960;
  • the post-independence epoch, including 3 constitutional instruments: 1963, 1979, and 1999.

READ ALSO: Constitutional development in Nigeria before Independence

Republican constitution of 1963

Republican constitution of 1963

The Republican Constitution was enacted on September 19, 1963. However, it came into effect on October 1, 1963. There were many reasons to change the law of the country at the time, some of them are:

  • it was high time to replaced the nominative power of the Queen of England as a head of state
  • the country needed an internal transformation from a nation governed by the monarch into an independent republic
  • the need for structuring and defining boundaries
  • for change within the governmental organs to provide more power and responsibility for those, who represent the state
  • the need for Nigeria to establish its own court of appeal and get rid of the Judicial Committee of the British Ivy Council
  • theneed for increasing the number of seats in the federal legislature

READ ALSO: Importance of constitution in Nigeria

With the adoption of the Nigeria constitution of 1963, the following set of rules was defined for the country:

  1. The Nigerian parliament has the right to pass an the act (instead of the British parliament).
  2. The Nigerian president will replace the Queen of England (as the head of state).
  3. The president is elected by the secret ballot and can be replaced through the procedure of impeachment.
  4. When the president is not in the country, his power is temporarily transmitted to the parliament.
  5. The Supreme Court of Nigeria is the highest in the country.
  6. The constitution establishes and defends the fundamental human rights.
  7. The new law abolished the judicial advisory committee.
  8. The Senate should increase the number of seats from 44 to 56. The houses of representatives should be expanded from 305 to 312.

1979 constitution of Nigeria

1979 Constitution in Nigeria

The following primary features characterize the act of 1979:

  1. The Constitution is the fundamental law. All the other rules should be adjusted according to its provisions.
  2. Three organs of government shared the power.
  3. The act established the Executive President to head the state and be the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces.
  4. The new law says the president to be chosen through the direct elections. He has to take votes in at least two-thirds of the states in Nigeria.
  5. The president should have running mates on the elections.
  6. One presidential can fulfill his duties on the position of the head of a state for four years and go for no more than two terms. The head of state, as well as his “mates”, could be replaced from the organs of government through the procedure of impeachment.
  7. According to the new act, the state should establish the national economic council, which will be headed by the Vice-president in cooperation with the governor of the central bank and all state governors.
A Nigerian with a flag

Photo: thecleanvibes.com

4 major differences between the constitution of 1963 and 1979:

  1. The constitution of 1963 used the British Parliamentary or Cabinet System. The act of 1979 adopted the American Presidential system (the Washington Model).
  2. Due to the constitution of 1963, the responsibility to head the state and be its official commander of the Armed Forces was laid on the Ceremonial President. The act of 1979 ensured the same functions for the Executive President.
  3. According to the act of 1963, the president was elected by the houses of Parliament, while its “edited version” of 1979 mentioned that the head of the state would be chosen on a general election.
  4. The first act of 1963 provided close relationships for the legislative and the executive powers. The later act of 1979 drew a clear boundary between them and divided their fields of powers.

As you can see, the changes put into the main legislative instrument of Nigeria were a necessary step towards better governance, control, and defending human rights within society.

READ ALSO: Fundamental duties of a citizen in Nigeria by the Constitution

Source: Legit.ng



from Nigeria News today & Breaking Naija news ▷ Read on LEGIT.NG 24/7 http://bit.ly/2Q7IXtX
via EDUPEDIA24/7

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

These funny food quotes will make you laugh like crazy

Food is not only an essential part of the daily routine but also the most exciting one. We cannot imagine our life without something yummy. How do you make ordinary eating fun and unforgettable? We bring to your attention amazing food quotes which will definitely make you smile. Image: unsplash.com (modified by author) Source: UGC Are you looking for interesting ideas to entertain your interlocutor while having lunch at work or family dinner? Then this article is definitely for you! Good food quotes Below are food quotes, aphorisms and witty statements. This is an exciting and extraordinary collection of the top "pearls of wisdom" on this topic. Here you can find funny jokes and sayings, intelligent thoughts of philosophers and original words of great thinkers and inspiring statuses from social networks, as well as many other things. The best appetite comes without food. I love calories. They are dаmn tasty. An empty stomach is the Devil's playground. Have bre

The Transitional Phase of African Poetry

The Transitional Phase The second phase, which we have chosen to call transitional, is represented by the poetry of writers like Abioseh Nicol, Gabriel Okara, Kwesi Brew, Dennis Brutus, Lenrie Peters and Joseph Kariuki. This is poetry which is written by people we normally refer to as modem and who may be thought of as belonging to the third phase. The characteristics of this poetry are its competent and articulate use of the received European language, its unforced grasp of Africa’s physical, cultural and socio-political environment and often its lyricism. To distinguish this type of poetry we have to refer back to the concept of appropriation we introduced earlier. At the simplest and basic level, the cultural mandate of possessing a people’s piece of the earth involves a mental and emotional homecoming within the physical environment. Poems like Brew’s ‘‘Dry season”, Okara’s “Call of the River Nun”, Nicol’s “The meaning of Africa” and Soyinka’s “Season”, to give a few examples,

The pioneering phase of African Poetry

The pioneering phase We have called the first phase that of the pioneers. But since the phrase “pioneer poets” has often been used of writers of English expression like Osadebay, Casely-Hayford and Dei-Anag, we should point out that our “pioneer phase” also includes Negritude poets of French expression. The poetry of this phase is that of writers in “exile” keenly aware of being colonials, whose identity was under siege. It is a poetry of protest against exploitation and racial discrimination, of agitation for political independence, of nostalgic evocation of Africa’s past and visions of her future. However, although these were themes common to poets of both English and French expression, the obvious differences between the Francophone poets and the Anglophone writers of the 1930s and 1940s have been generally noted. Because of the intensity with which they felt their physical exile from Africa, coupled with their exposure to the experimental contemporary modes of writing in F